The Real McCain

I can’t imagine another 4 years listening to a preppy bad boy who graduated at the low end of his class, managed to do well on his family’s influence and money, left a trail of expensive wreckage behind him, refused to believe that rules applied to him, and will look you directly in the face and lie. Eight years is enough, and more of the same is unthinkable.
http://www.youtube.com/p/95AAB283286F78B6

Still enjoying the peaches!




DSCN0503.JPG

Originally uploaded by Thirdlayer

My small (semi-dwarf) peach tree produced lots of peaches this summer!

Reality surfaces

The Wall Street Journal likes Barack Obama?s economics, and refers to the Fed and Bush treasury?s ?destructive and all but explicit dollar devaluation strategy.?

Barack Obama

Free Market

If you believe government should leave business alone because business will do good for people because it makes more money for them if they have good service and good products to offer, you must read this article in The New York Times. If you read it all and still think government should not regulate business, you need to read it again.

Did I say the dogwood trees are blooming?




dogwood2008.jpg

Originally uploaded by Thirdlayer

Sure, right

I’m saying, if you lie about one thing you have to lie about the next related thing because when you start telling the truth people know you were lying. So in spite of the fact that the Limbaugh switchers in PA said in exit polls that they voted for Obama, I believe they voted for Clinton.
I hate to say a lot of people are lying, but here is how it works:

  • If, as a Limbaugh switcher, I had voted for Clinton, I would be negating the effect of that vote to say I voted for Clinton. That would make people think her win was false, and that would not boost her favor as a candidate.
  • On the other hand, if I were a Limbaugh switcher and voted for Clinton (which I am sure they did) and said I voted for Obama, that would make it look like Hillary was actually getting more Democrats to vote for her.

Not to parse it to finely, a Limbaugh switcher would have to lie to the election commission and say they were a Democrat when they were in truth intending to act in support of the Republican ticket. That means that going in they would have one lie to their credit. Coming out and asked to state which candidate they voted for, they have to say “Obama.” If they say “Clinton,” they are saying, “Hey, I am a Limbaugh switcher who lied to the election commission.”
It seems more realistic to me to believe that Obama brought out a lot of people who have not voted before, and he closed the lead on Clinton even against the tide of switchers. I believe that is where the actual evidence tends.

In for a Penny, in for a Pound

Now think about it — If you were a Republican in PA who was lowlife enough to change your party registration in order to select the Democrat that McCain thought would be easier to beat, would you feel honor bound to tell the pollster the truth about that? Changing your registration falsely to influence the political decision of another party in a national election is not any penny ante “oh-no-those-jeans-don’t-make-you-look-fat” lie.
I’m guessing that the switchers are 90% McCain supporters responding to the Limbaugh imperative.

Just hold on — the economic stimulus is coming

The New York Times today in a story Retailing Chains Caught in a Wave of Bankruptcies By Michael Barbaro:

Since last fall, eight mostly midsize chains ? as diverse as the furniture store Levitz and the electronics seller Sharper Image ? have filed for bankruptcy protection as they staggered under mounting debt and declining sales.
But the troubles are quickly spreading to bigger national companies, like Linens ?n Things, the bedding and furniture retailer with 500 stores in 47 states. It may file for bankruptcy as early as this week, according to people briefed on the matter.
Even retailers that can avoid bankruptcy are shutting down stores to preserve cash through what could be a long economic downturn. Over the next year, Foot Locker said it would close 140 stores, Ann Taylor will start to shutter 117, and the jeweler Zales will close 100.

When you lose stores because people can?t buy, you lose services because stores can?t stock their shelves and pay their bills:

Because retailers rely on a broad network of suppliers, their bankruptcies are rippling across the economy. The cash-short chains are leaving behind tens of millions of dollars in unpaid bills to shipping companies, furniture manufacturers, mall owners and advertising agencies. Many are unlikely to be paid in full, spreading the economic pain.
When it filed for bankruptcy, Sharper Image owed $6.6 million to United Parcel Service. The furniture chain Levitz owed Sealy $1.4 million.
And it is not just large companies that are absorbing the losses. When Domain, the furniture retailer, filed for bankruptcy, it owed On Time Express, a 90-employee transportation and logistics company in Tempe, Ariz., about $30,000.

And then of course people can?t buy because they lose their jobs when stores and services close down.
If you aren?t big oil or an Iraq war profiteer, you would most likely be a person somewhere in this picture. You could be a person paying more for food because it moves around in trucks that burn gas and paying more for gas to drive to work, and therefore you are less able to buy those shoes you want from Foot Locker or that cool lamp from Sharper Image. Or you could be one of the employees getting laid off because the store you work for is closing. In fact, you could be both. You could even be both of these and a person whose house is being foreclosed ? which if that were me, I know I would be a person going without medical care for stress, which I wouldn?t be able to afford.
I?m just glad our decider has a stimulus package coming down the pike that will fix everything.

Wishing Hillary was more like a Democrat

There is enough bad stuff to go around — I can’t imagine why Hillary finds it acceptable to exaggerate and embellish, when if you look around it is certainly not necessary. She looks more and more like “them” and not “us.” She plays with the lobbyists and tells us half-truths and exaggerations, so I expect she will not be a strong agent for change. Her own medical plan still serves the insurance companies and not the people, setting up a system in which people are forced by law to pay insurance companies.
When the game is money and manipulation, it is always the people who lose. Here is John Edwards telling us why we have such a mess, and I want to say he has been right for a long time.

If I have to choose between John McCain and Hillary Clinton, it won’t be a toss-up. I would have to go with Clinton. But my teeth are clinching thinking about the possibility.